Human Science

Requirement:
1:This task is very important to me
2:You must read all the materials carefully
3:thank you

Criterion 1: Content Criterion 2: Structure/organisation/task completion Criterion 3: Evidence of research and citation

H1
80-100%
Outstanding

– Excellent content and extended thinking
– Evidence of conceptual clarity
– Development of highly engaging central argument
Independent thinking; displays a ‘voice’

– Coherent and logical
– Task completed
– Clear paragraphs with logical connections
– Extremely well-written (grammar etc.)
– Within word limit

– Uses appropriate number of scholarly references
– Evidence of wider reading and research
– Systematic application of academic referencing style
– Well integrated source material

H2A
75-79%
Very high
standard

– Strong content and some extended thinking
– Evidence of conceptual clarity
– Development of a central argument
– Independent thinking; displays a ‘voice’

– Coherent and logical, with minor inconsistencies
– Task completed
– Clear paragraphs with logical connection
– Fairly well-written (minimal errors in grammar etc.)
– Within word limit

– Uses appropriate number of scholarly references
– Evidence of some wider reading and research
– Systematic application of academic referencing style
– Integrates source material fairly well

H2B
70-74%
High standard

– Fairly strong content and some attempt at extended
thinking (though not always convincingly)
– Evidence of conceptual clarity; minor gaps may be evident
– Development of a clear argument, though the central
point is not always sustained/evident.
– Some independent thinking; displays a ‘voice’

– Coherent and logical, with some inconsistencies
– Task completed, though some aspects of assignment not
well balanced
– Clear paragraphs, with connections between them.
– Some writing is weak or lacks clarity/focus.
– Fairly clear writing, but with persistent errors
– Within word limit

– Uses appropriate number of scholarly references
– Some evidence of wider reading and research
– Systematic application of academic referencing style,
although with some mistakes.
– Integrates source material, though not always well.

H3
65-69%
Sound work

– Only moderately strong content; some attempt at
extended thinking (though not always convincingly)
– Some conceptual clarity; gaps are evident
– Some attempt to develop central argument.
– Limited independent thinking.

– Coherent, but with inconsistencies
– Task completed; aspects of assignment not well balanced
– Mostly clear paragraphs, with connections between them.
– Writing is sometimes weak or lacks clarity/focus.
– Writing has errors of grammar/spelling etc.
– Within word limit

– Uses appropriate number of scholarly references
– Limited evidence of wider reading and research
– Systematic application of academic referencing style,
although with evident mistakes.
– Integrates source material, though not always well.

Pass
50-64%
Satisfactory

– Weak content; minimal attempt at extended thinking
– Some conceptual clarity; clear gaps are evident
– Limited attempt to develop/sustain central point.
– Limited independent thinking.

– Problems with coherence and logic.
– Task completed, though assignment not well balanced
– Paragraphs difficult to follow in parts; weak connections.
– Writing has consistent errors of grammar/spelling etc.
– Within word limit

– Uses appropriate number of scholarly references
– Limited evidence of wider reading and research
– Appropriate academic referencing, though with mistakes.
– Weak integration of source material.

Fail
<50%
Unsatisfactory

– Weak content; no attempt at extended thinking
– Lack of conceptual clarity
– No clear central argument.
– No independent thinking.

– Not coherent or logical.
– Task not completed
– Unclear and weak connections between paragraphs.
– Writing has consistent errors of grammar/spelling etc.
– Not within word limit

– Does not use appropriate number of scholarly references
– Very limited evidence of wider reading and research
– Poor application of academic referencing style, with
consistent mistakes, or no referencing
– Limited or no attempts to integrate source material.