Bridging the Gap between Science and Policy Making
Assignment 2: Bridging the Gap between Science and Policy
Prepare a policy brief for decision makers explaining how environmental science is often not
well used in the policy making process. Your brief should provide evidence based on example
policies from aesourcen environmental management domain (e.g. biodiversity conservation, climate
change, water r management, sustainable forest management, etc.) of your choice.
The policy brief must include recommendations regarding how the gap between
environmental science and policy making can be bridged in your chosen context.
Your policy brief should be 4-6 pages in length.
Using Chicago reference style. Link: https://libguides.murdoch.edu.au/Chicago/sample
Using journal article reference
NOTE: To successfully complete this assignment, students will need to draw upon the key
messages from the course lectures and assigned readings from TOPICS 5-6.
The following table sets forth the criteria to be used to grade this assignment. Students should
use this table to help them determine how to invest their efforts.
Bridging the Gap between Science and Policy
Public policies are important guidelines on how public issues are managed. These policies arise from a concerted effort of different stakeholders and are meant to help the public deal with challenges they are facing. Public policies are meant to propose the best solution to public problems, but this is not always the case because some policies are not backed by appropriate research evidence of the proposed solutions (Spruijt, Knol, Vasileiadou, Devilee, Lebret, and Petersen 2014). This arises because of the gap between science and policy. Science defines life in the modern society (Knaggard 2014). It is the foundation of all modern life permeating all spheres of life in telecommunication, internet, transportation, medicine, public health, agriculture, climate change, and other areas. Science is therefore called up to generate evidence that is used in formulation of public policies that affects life (Singh, Tam, Sisk, Klain, Mach, Martone & Chan 2014). As an analytical process that generates evidence by concrete research data, science is founded on the hypothesis of tangible proof for any theory it advances. However, there are scientific uncertainties that offer excuses for not implementing or adopting the evidence-based practices recommended. Available evidence shows that such uncertainties greatly affect how people believe in science and how they adopt recommendations given.. Bridging the Gap between Science and Policy Making…………
or ORDER A CUSTOM PAPER